The Dossier is what a board, a regulator, or a court actually reads. It compresses seven stages of work into a document that answers the only question that matters after the fact: what did we know, when did we know it, and who said otherwise.
Every figure in the Dossier links back to its source claim and evidence class. Every recommendation links back to the lens finding that produced it. Every approval links back to the conditions attached to it. There is no executive summary that isn’t backed by the underlying record.
The decision, its sponsor, and the mandate under which it was evaluated.
Every source claim, its class, owner, freshness, and any contradiction flags.
TCO, NPV, IRR, payback, and the base/upside/downside/stress comparison.
Findings, severity, and mitigation owners across every required lens.
Every disagreement raised in the Challenge Room, and how — or whether — it was resolved.
Which articles applied, whether they were satisfied, and the signed approval chain.
Every claim in the Dossier carries one of four tags, visible inline, never buried in a footnote.
A verified, sourced fact with a named owner.
A reasoned conclusion drawn from evidence, explicitly marked as such.
A stated premise the decision depends on, with its validation schedule.
A human call made under uncertainty, attributed to the person who made it.
Walk through a real bank AI-investment decision, end to end, exactly as it would reach a board.