ARCHAI WORLD STUDIO | ENTERPRISE MISSIONS

Stop Buying AI Experiments. Start Deploying Business Missions.

Define a business problem. Connect approved enterprise context. Configure an accountable agent workflow. Produce evidence a person can review and act on.

Explore Enterprise MissionsRequest a Custom Mission

Anatomy of a mission

  1. 1

    Business problem

    One question an executive must answer

  2. 2

    Approved context

    Only sources you authorize, scoped per mission

  3. 3

    Agent workflow

    Bounded steps with stated limits

  4. 4

    Human review

    A named person approves consequential outcomes

  5. 5

    Evidence

    Cited outputs and explicit gaps

Mission catalog

Eight mission blueprints. Each is a proposed scenario with defined boundaries, not a pre-installed integration. Sources are connected only after scoping and authorization.

Showing 8 of 8 missions

BankingCritical risk

Banking Incident Commander

Analyze service dependencies, incident consequences and decision options.

Business question
A critical service is down. Which business processes, customers and obligations are affected, and who must decide what next?
Required data
Service catalog, Application repository, CMDB, Incident records, Vendor inventory, Business continuity plans
Outcome
A decision brief with affected services, dependency map, business impact, evidence gaps and recovery options.
Human review
A named decision owner approves any escalation or recovery option before it is acted on.
Dependencies
  • Authorized read access to at least one dependency source
  • Named incident decision owner
  • Approved continuity plan references
Pilot scopingView mission
Cross-industryHigh risk

Enterprise Dependency Investigator

Identify recorded dependencies and change impact.

Business question
If we change, retire or replace this component, what else does the record say will be affected?
Required data
Application inventory, Architecture repository, Interface and integration records, Change requests
Outcome
A change-impact dossier of recorded dependencies, unknowns and owners to consult.
Human review
An enterprise architect validates the dossier before it reaches a change board.
Dependencies
  • Access to an architecture or CMDB repository
  • Defined scope of components
  • Named architecture reviewer
BlueprintView mission
Cross-industryHigh risk

AI Agent Approval Dossier

Examine agent permissions, evidence and approval scope.

Business question
What is this agent allowed to touch, what evidence supports that, and what exactly are we approving?
Required data
Agent specification, Permission and access model, Data classification policy, Test or evaluation evidence
Outcome
An approval dossier that states scope, permissions, evidence and open risks for a named approver.
Human review
The accountable approver accepts, restricts or rejects the agent; nothing is auto-approved.
Dependencies
  • Agent specification available
  • Applicable AI policy
  • Named approving authority
BlueprintView mission
Cross-industryHigh risk

CFO Financial Decision Brief

Analyze financial scenarios, assumptions and executive options.

Business question
Given these assumptions, what are the realistic scenarios and which assumptions drive the answer?
Required data
Scenario inputs from finance, Assumption register, Relevant policy or covenant constraints, Prior period actuals provided by the team
Outcome
An executive brief with scenarios, assumption sensitivity and options for the CFO to evaluate.
Human review
The CFO or delegate reviews assumptions and conclusions before any distribution.
Dependencies
  • Inputs supplied by finance
  • Agreed assumption owners
  • Clear decision to be informed
Pilot scopingView mission
ProcurementModerate risk

Vendor Renewal Risk Mission

Identify contracts approaching renewal and ownership gaps.

Business question
Which contracts renew soon, who owns them, and which renewals carry unmanaged risk?
Required data
Contract register, Vendor inventory, Business owner assignments, Spend records
Outcome
A renewal watchlist with ownership gaps, notice deadlines and suggested review actions.
Human review
A procurement lead confirms the watchlist and assigns owners before any vendor contact.
Dependencies
  • Contract register export or access
  • Notice-period data
  • Procurement reviewer
BlueprintView mission
TelecommunicationsHigh risk

Telco Service Impact Mission

Examine service, process and application dependencies.

Business question
When a network or platform element degrades, which services, processes and applications does the record link to it?
Required data
Service inventory, Application and platform records, Process documentation, Incident and change history
Outcome
A service-impact view linking elements to services and processes, with gaps highlighted.
Human review
A service owner validates the impact view before it informs prioritization.
Dependencies
  • Integration design for operational sources
  • Service ownership data
  • Named service owner
Integration design requiredView mission
RetailModerate risk

Retail Inventory Decision Mission

Evaluate inventory, replenishment and operational risk.

Business question
Where are stock positions and replenishment plans creating avoidable risk, and what are the options?
Required data
Inventory positions, Replenishment rules, Supplier lead times, Sales trend extracts
Outcome
A decision brief on exposed categories, drivers and replenishment options.
Human review
An operations lead decides which options proceed.
Dependencies
  • Inventory and sales extracts
  • Replenishment rule documentation
  • Operations reviewer
BlueprintView mission
Cross-industryModerate risk

Project Portfolio Early-Warning Mission

Review project evidence, delivery risks and escalation needs.

Business question
Which projects show evidence of delivery risk now, and what needs escalation?
Required data
Project status reports, Milestone and budget records, Risk and issue logs, Dependency records
Outcome
An early-warning report that cites evidence per project and proposes escalations.
Human review
The PMO lead confirms which warnings are escalated and to whom.
Dependencies
  • Access to portfolio records
  • Consistent status fields
  • PMO reviewer
BlueprintView mission

FEATURED MISSION | BANKING

The Incident Is Already Happening. Does Your Enterprise Understand the Consequences?

A critical banking service becomes unavailable before payroll processing.

Potential sources include a service catalog, application repository, CMDB, incident records, vendor inventory and business continuity plans. None is connected by default; each is scoped and authorized per engagement.

  1. Stage 1

    Detect context

    Read the incident record and identify the affected service and its owner.

  2. Stage 2

    Investigate dependencies

    Trace recorded dependencies across authorized sources and cite each link.

  3. Stage 3

    Prepare decision brief

    Assemble affected services, impact, evidence gaps and recovery options.

  4. Stage 4

    Escalate for human approval

    Route the brief to the named decision owner. Nothing proceeds without approval.

Synthetic demonstrationHarborline Bank (fictional)

Fictional bank and fictional data. This output illustrates the format only and was not produced from any real institution or connected system.

INC-0000 (synthetic): Payments Batch Gateway unavailable, 04:40, payroll window opens 06:00

Affected services

  • Payments Batch Gateway
  • Payroll Disbursement Service
  • Corporate Treasury Reporting

Business process impact

  • Employer payroll runs for corporate clients: at risk of missing the 06:00 window
  • Intraday liquidity reporting: delayed until the gateway recovers

Dependency map

  • Payments Batch Gateway
    • Core Ledger API (recorded)
    • Message Queue Cluster B (recorded)
    • Vendor: ClearRoute Settlement (recorded)
  • Payroll Disbursement Service
    • Payments Batch Gateway (recorded)
    • HR Payroll Export (recorded)
  • Corporate Treasury Reporting
    • Payments Batch Gateway (inferred, needs confirmation)

Evidence gaps

  • No recovery time objective recorded for Message Queue Cluster B
  • Continuity plan for ClearRoute Settlement last reviewed 19 months ago
  • Treasury Reporting dependency is inferred, not recorded

Recovery options for human decision

  • Fail over to secondary queue cluster

    Fastest on paper; the failover procedure is untested in the record.

  • Defer payroll window by 90 minutes

    Protects data integrity; requires client communication approval.

  • Manual settlement through vendor fallback

    Documented in the plan; higher operational effort and error risk.

Decision owner: Head of Payments Operations (synthetic role)

Deploy This Mission With AI SWATView mission detail

How Studio works with DOTs

Five parts, each with one clear responsibility.

  1. 01

    A DOT holds a specialized responsibility

    A DOT is a focused agent role, such as investigating dependencies or preparing a brief. It does one kind of work well and says what it cannot do.

  2. 02

    A Studio mission defines a bounded unit of work

    The mission states the business question, the sources allowed, the outputs expected and when the work is complete.

  3. 03

    Enterprise Context MCP provides authorized information when configured

    Where an organization authorizes it, the MCP supplies governed context to the mission. Without it, missions work from information a person provides.

  4. 04

    Governance determines what requires approval

    Rules set which actions and outputs are blocked, allowed or held for a named reviewer.

  5. 05

    An accountable person reviews consequential outcomes

    Decisions that matter are made by people. The mission prepares evidence; it does not take over accountability.

Communications integration concept

Proposed integration architecture. Validation required.

Some missions may need to reach people through channels such as WhatsApp, SMS, RCS or voice. This is a conceptual architecture showing where a compatible messaging provider could sit, for example Infobip.

  1. Mission

    Prepares a message for human approval

  2. Approval gate

    A named person approves content and recipients

  3. Provider adapter

    A messaging provider such as Infobip, if validated

  4. Channel

    WhatsApp, SMS, RCS or voice

  • No commercial partnership with any provider is implied.
  • Compatibility is not verified until tested in your environment.
  • Channel terms, consent and regulatory requirements remain the organization's responsibility.

Choose your delivery path

Three separate paths with separate entitlements. None includes another automatically.

Self-directed

ARCHAI WORLD Studio Professional

US$4,997 / 12 months

Individual professional access to build and run missions yourself.

Includes Studio access only. It does not include Enterprise Context MCP, team seats, custom integrations or an enterprise pilot.

Activate Studio

Authorized business context

ARCHAI Enterprise Context MCP

US$4,997 / 12 months

Governed context from authorized sources made available to missions.

A separate product with its own entitlement. It does not include Studio Professional or any managed delivery.

View Enterprise Context MCP

Managed enterprise pilot

Managed pilot with AI SWAT

Starting at US$19,997

A scoped, accountable pilot delivered for your organization.

Scoped per engagement. Studio and MCP are not automatically included; any needed access is defined in the pilot scope.

Explore the enterprise pilot

Frequently asked questions

Can a mission work without MCP?

Yes. A mission can run on information a person provides. Enterprise Context MCP is optional and is used only when an organization authorizes governed access to its sources.

What requires human approval?

Anything consequential: escalations, recovery options, approvals, outbound communications and any change to a system. The mission prepares evidence and proposals; a named person decides.

Can missions use private data?

Only data you authorize, for a defined scope. Private data is never assumed to be available, and sources are connected only after scoping and review.

How are credentials managed?

Credentials are not requested through the request form. Access is arranged during scoping using the organization's own controls, with least-privilege, read-only access as the default starting point.

Do we need new software?

Not necessarily. Missions are designed around the tools and records you already have. Any additional integration is identified in scoping rather than assumed.

What constitutes completion?

Each mission defines acceptance criteria up front: evidence-linked outputs, stated gaps and a recorded human decision. A mission is complete when those criteria are met, not when an agent stops running.

What is the difference between Studio access and an enterprise pilot?

Studio access is self-directed professional use. An enterprise pilot is a managed, scoped engagement for your organization. They are separate entitlements and neither includes the other automatically.

Who owns the resulting deliverables?

Ownership terms are confirmed in writing as part of scoping. The default intent is that your organization owns the deliverables produced from its own information.

Request a mission

Tell us the business problem. We review every request and reply to your work email. Credentials are never requested here.